the correspondent’s premise that the legality of an act was the sole criterion by which one could or should judge it chilled me. It is a sinister premise. It makes the legislature the complete arbiter of manners and morals, and thus accords to the state quasi-totalitarian powers without the state’s ever having claimed them. The state alone decides what we have or lack permission to do: we have to make no moral decisions for ourselves, for what we have legal permission to do is also, by definition, morally acceptable.
Thursday, February 23, 2006
Totalitarian legalism
Intelligent atheist Theodore Dalrymple observes:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment